Back to Insights

NHS Digital Transformation 27 March 2026 | Reviewed September 2026 — checked against NHS England's current Digital Maturity Assessment and EPR usability guidance

The NHS Has Built Its Digital Foundations. Now Comes the Harder Part.

Copy link

Share on LinkedIn

The NHS Digital Maturity Assessment measures how effectively NHS providers and integrated care systems use digital, data and technology across seven dimensions of the What Good Looks Like framework: Well led, Smart foundations, Safe practice, Support people, Empower citizens, Improve care and Healthy populations. The 2025 assessment shows that the NHS has established strong digital foundations — including 93% EPR adoption among trusts — but the next challenge is optimisation rather than deployment. Only 30% have fully integrated bi-directional data flows, while the 2024 EPR Usability Survey shows continuing challenges around training, workflow integration and administrative burden. Digital maturity therefore depends not simply on having technology, but on whether systems, people, workflows and governance combine to improve care and make effective use of clinical time.

NHS England's 2025 Digital Maturity Assessment and 2024 EPR Usability Survey paint an encouraging picture of progress — and a clear-eyed account of what remains. At the centre of both is a problem that technology alone cannot solve: the documentation burden on clinical staff.

What Is the NHS Digital Maturity Assessment?

NHS England's Digital Maturity Assessment (DMA) helps NHS providers and integrated care systems understand their digital maturity by identifying strengths and gaps in digital service provision.

The assessment uses a baseline set of 50 questions based on the seven dimensions of NHS England's What Good Looks Like framework. NHS England uses the results to establish a national baseline, track progress over time and help organisations and systems identify priorities for digital development and investment.

The seven dimensions are:

Digital Maturity Is Not the Same as Digitisation

An organisation can have widespread digital technology without having fully realised its benefits.

NHS England's current analysis makes this distinction clear. The 2025 DMA shows widespread adoption of core digital capabilities, but NHS England says further value depends particularly on better integration, optimisation, skills and governance.

The accompanying EPR Usability Survey reinforces the point from the workforce perspective: technology delivers greater value when system design, training and workflows support staff to use it effectively.

Digital maturity is therefore better understood as the ability to turn digital capability into improved care, outcomes, staff experience and effective use of resources — not simply the number of digital systems an organisation has deployed.

Strong Foundations — But Infrastructure Is Not Impact

NHS England has published the findings of its 2025 Digital Maturity Assessment (DMA) alongside the 2024 EPR Usability Survey — together offering the most comprehensive picture yet of where the NHS stands on its digital journey, and what the next phase will require.

The headline finding is genuinely encouraging. Strong digital foundations are now in place:

The analogue to digital shift — one of the three core commitments in the 10 Year Health Plan — has, at infrastructure level, largely happened.

But infrastructure and impact are not the same thing.

As Dermot Ryan, NHS England's Director of Digital Transformation, puts it:

"The findings show that to deliver the government's 10 Year Health Plan we must focus on maximising the effectiveness of existing digital platforms — so staff can work more effectively and patients experience safer, more joined up care."

The word "maximising" is doing significant work here. It signals that the next phase is not about deployment. It is about whether digital systems actually change how clinical work gets done.

• 93% of trusts have an Electronic Patient Record (EPR) system
• 90% have a central data repository
• 86% deliver Hospital at Home services

The Documentation Problem

The EPR Usability Survey is where the findings become most uncomfortable — and most instructive.

Many clinicians report spending significant time on administrative tasks within EPRs — particularly where workflows are not optimised.

This is not a technology failure in the conventional sense. The systems are deployed. They are, largely, being used. But they are producing a documentation and administrative burden that consumes clinical time rather than releasing it.

The promise of digital transformation in healthcare has always been, at its core, a promise about time — time returned to clinicians, redirected from administration to patients. The DMA findings suggest that promise has not yet been fully delivered.

The infrastructure is there. What remains is the harder work:

Only 30% of trusts have fully integrated, bidirectional data flows. Only half have simplified patient-facing digital access. The NHS has the foundations of digital maturity — but not yet the integration and usability required for those foundations to become clinically transformative.

• 60% of doctors and 70% of nurses say they would welcome additional EPR training
• 44% report receiving no further training after joining their organisation
• Evidence suggests regular training can return 50–60 minutes of clinical time per week

• Workflow redesign
• System optimisation
• Usability improvements
• Translating digital capability into recovered clinical time

From Deployment to Optimisation

The report is explicit about what the next phase requires. It is less about implementing new technology, and more about getting more from what is already in place: improving system configuration; simplifying high-volume workflows; making better use of existing data; and improving usability in systems already deployed.

This shift — from deployment to optimisation — matters.

Digital transformation is not complete when systems are installed. It is complete when those systems change the nature of the work. That transition depends on things technology procurement rarely solves on its own: workflow redesign, staff training, change management — and, critically, documentation practice.

Documentation is where clinical time and digital systems meet. It is where friction accumulates. Every duplicate record, inconsistently formatted note, manually re-entered data point, and information siloed by poor integration is not an abstract interoperability problem. It is a documentation problem, felt by individual clinicians and multiplied across the system.

The Governance Dimension

The DMA also highlights an adjacent — and increasingly urgent — issue: governance.

Digital systems are only as effective as the governance frameworks that define:

In the NHS context, this includes emerging questions around AI-assisted documentation — tools already proliferating in clinical environments, often without formal institutional frameworks governing their use.

The DMA does not directly address AI documentation governance. But its findings create the conditions in which that question becomes unavoidable.

As clinical staff seek to reduce administrative burden, AI documentation tools will be adopted. The question is whether that adoption happens within governance frameworks that preserve professional accountability and evidential integrity — or in their absence.

• Two-thirds of providers say executive teams understand digital workforce requirements
• Three-quarters understand their technical debt
• 90% have data repositories — but data quality and consistency vary significantly

• What is recorded
• How it is recorded
• How records are maintained
• How accountability is preserved

What This Means for the Regulated Sectors ReporticaAI Serves

NHS England's findings reinforce what ReporticaAI observes across the regulated sectors it serves: the infrastructure is often in place; the documentation practices are not.

In each case, the gap is not technology. It is the quality, consistency, and professional rigour of documentation — and the lack of governance frameworks for the AI tools increasingly used to produce it.

The NHS's transition from deployment to optimisation mirrors the journey underway across adult social care, healthcare education, and professional practice environments more broadly.

That transition requires not just better technology, but better governance of documentation — because documentation is the evidence base for safe, accountable, inspectable care.

• Care homes use CQC-aligned systems
• Student nurses use digital portfolio tools
• Social workers use case management platforms

What Did the Latest NHS Digital Maturity and EPR Findings Show?

The findings support NHS England's wider conclusion that the next phase of digital transformation is about getting more value from systems already in place: improving configuration, simplifying high-volume workflows, strengthening interoperability, developing workforce capability and improving usability.